Ben Hourigan Writer and editor.

2Jun/080

I’m back

It’s been over a year. Towards the middle of 2007 I became unsure what image and content this blog was trying to put forward, so I put up a basic placeholder with this short bio:

Benjamin Hourigan is the editor at the Centre for Independent Studies, a libertarian think-tank based in Sydney. He has previously been an assistant editor and subeditor at Architecture Media, publisher of magazines including Artichoke, Landscape Architecture Australia, and Houses. His writing has been published in a range of venues, including The Age, News Weekly, Australasian Drama Studies, and the IPA Review. He has given lectures at RMIT and at the University of Melbourne, where he has also tutored. He has been interviewed on Melbourne radio station 3LO, and for articles syndicated in the Christian Science Monitor and USA Today.

He is currently enrolled in the MBA program at the University of Technology, Sydney.

Benjamin is available for freelance writing and editing work. He has specialized experience in architectural publishing, editing for business, pharmaceuticals, videogaming, policy analysis, cultural studies, English literature, and Asian studies.

Now I have a better idea of what I want this to be, expect a few changes, including a header redesign. Postings will now be on matters I have a professional or journalistic interest in. The personal will take a back seat.

More soon.

20Feb/050

Nathan Barley

A little while ago Mel posted a link to an article, along with some of her own musings (scroll down and look for February 16) expressing distaste for the emotionally arid cleverness of McSweeney’s. Both this post and Christian’s (again, no permalink, look for February 18), mentioning it, also link to the fictional exploits of a character called Nathan Barley, as does one of Glen’s.

Nathan Barley’s misadventures are partly the work of British satirist Chris Morris, and lampoon the exact kind of self-satisfied, callous slime that media-savvy, kitsch-aware Cultural Studies postgrad bloggers could easily be mistaken for (and sometimes correctly identified as). The point, to me, seems to be to point out the absolute hideousness of intelligent but useless people who are constantly obsessed with nothing but their own satisfaction, which often involves making sure everyone is convinced of their consummate cleverness and cutting-edge, self-reflexive fashionability. As such, it seems to have been quite naturally associated with the critique of McSweeney’s. I don’t read McSweeney’s (though I’ve checked out the website, and my friend Dave started a parody of it), so I can’t comment on it with authority, but the bunch of posts I’ve referenced seems to add up to a critique of a mindset which is, unfortunately, depressingly familiar to me from personal experience, and which I am hypochondrially inclined to worry I might at times exhibit.

The whole Nathan Barley saga reminds me quite strongly of the work of the Nobel-prize-winning Japanese author Ôe Kenzaburô. Both are in the style of “grotesque realism,” a literary technique that highlights despicable behaviour and the variously disgusting (but also sometimes wonderful) functions and imperfections of the human body and the suffering they cause. But while Ôe’s protagonists are usually redeemed by their encounters with human suffering, for which they are often at least partially to blame, developing a sense of compassion and remorse, for Barley there is no redemption.

Even so, I can’t help be envious of the fictional, parentally-supported creep. After all, he seems to get everything he wants, and all he has to give up in exchange is his soul…

5Feb/0511

Wiping Linux off my hard drive

If there’s anyone who wasn’t quite sure if I’m a computer geek, this is the post to prove it…

Ever since I went to the Digital Arts and Culture conference at RMIT in 2003, where I presented this paper, (many of the political arguments of which I now thoroughly disagree with), and where every second attendee was toting some kind of Apple notebook, I’ve been “a Mac person,” as some people I know would put it. I’ve also managed to bring my entire family to the Apple fold; even Mum and Dad are about to buy a new G4 iBook.

Now, OS X 10.3 came with my Powerbook G4, and it’s a great operating system, the best I’ve ever used, in fact. But I also really love the idea of Linux, and also some of the software that is unique to the free-*nix world, like GNOME. I have, however, struggled in vain to make it my sole operating system on both my Powerbook and my x86 PC. I’m currently removing it from my Powerbook, where it’s sat, unused, eating 10 gigs of my hard drive, and it may well vanish from my PC, as well.

I came to this conclusion last night after having a go at installing the latest preview release of Ubuntu Linux, dubbed the “Hoary Hedgehog.” Ubuntu is my favourite distro to date, despite being relatively new. It uses Debian’s APT for package management, so installing new software from online repositories is a snap, and it always comes with the latest version of GNOME. The last release had been sitting on my harddrive unused because it neither supported Airport Expresss (Broadcom’s fault), nor had a working PPPOE utility, and without internet access, a computer isn’t very useful to me.

Hoary’s networking worked fine. Still no wireless, but PPPOE was easy, so I could get online to download some codecs to, in theory, watch some Rurouni Kenshin (in .ogm). But when I finally got them working in gxine, the sound was way too quiet (even with everything at full volume), and trying to use Totem to play the files made my mouse-pointer freeze (needing not just an X-server restart, but a complete reboot to fix). Mounting my HFS+ drive in Ubuntu, I later discovered with Disk Utility.app in OS X, also created some minor, fixable errors.

On top of that, there’s no Exposé, no hardware acceleration for the GUI (and once Tiger comes out, I’ll be saying: “no integrated widget system, no system-wide instant search,” and so on). When compared to Windows, the GNOME GUI is brilliant: multiple desktops, fast drawing of image thumbnails, great usability; but when compared to OS X, GNOME seems like ancient history. KDE is awful, I don’t use it at all.

There’s also very few commercial games for Linux, and sorry, open-source developers, but the only real AAA titles are commercial. Even OS X doesn’t do so poorly in this area, in comparison. Things like Nethack and interactive fiction are great, but they aren’t pushing any technical boundaries.

Other than commercial games, I use free software almost exclusively on my Mac: LyX, OpenOffice, AbiWord, Firefox, Adium, Instiki, MPlayerOSX, VLC, FFView, and more. The list is similar on my PC, where I’m running all this stuff under Windows. All this stuff was born of the same, free software movement that created Linux, and which desperately wants Linux to be the world’s operating system of choice. But I’m sorry to say that despite these applications having delivered technically advanced ways to do my work and to share it across my computers and with others using open file formats, Linux just isn’t the OS to run them on. It isn’t the best. It still won’t “just work,” “out of the box,” or off the bootable CD if you will.

I want the best OS I can have, and I’ll even pay money for it. I paid nearly $150 for Panther the year before last, and I consider it one of the most worthwhile purchases I’ve ever made. When Linux is the best there is, maybe I’ll come back to the fold. But for now, I’m looking forward to having an extra 10 gigs free on my hard drive.