Benjamin Hourigan

It’s been over a year. Towards the middle of 2007 I became unsure what image and content this blog was trying to put forward, so I put up a basic placeholder with this short bio:

Benjamin Hourigan is the editor at the Centre for Independent Studies, a libertarian think-tank based in Sydney. He has previously been an assistant editor and subeditor at Architecture Media, publisher of magazines including Artichoke, Landscape Architecture Australia, and Houses. His writing has been published in a range of venues, including The Age, News Weekly, Australasian Drama Studies, and the IPA Review. He has given lectures at RMIT and at the University of Melbourne, where he has also tutored. He has been interviewed on Melbourne radio station 3LO, and for articles syndicated in the Christian Science Monitor and USA Today.

He is currently enrolled in the MBA program at the University of Technology, Sydney.

Benjamin is available for freelance writing and editing work. He has specialized experience in architectural publishing, editing for business, pharmaceuticals, videogaming, policy analysis, cultural studies, English literature, and Asian studies.

Now I have a better idea of what I want this to be, expect a few changes, including a header redesign. Postings will now be on matters I have a professional or journalistic interest in. The personal will take a back seat.

More soon.

Today, my email conversation with Michelle Smith, Publications Officer for UMPA, continues with more from me. Tomorrow: A further response from Michelle…

For newcomers, VSU = “Voluntary Student Unionism,” and UMPA = “University of Melbourne Postgraduate Association.”

Ben Hourigan on VSU and Postgraduate Review, part 2

Dear Michelle,

Thankyou for your prompt and extensive reply. I did not intend my letter to be a complaint: rather I had composed it as though it were to be published on a letters page, intending to reflect on the relationship between identity politics and VSU. You and your editorial staff put in the work to compile PGR, and I would consider it inappropriate to complain about content unless it was factually incorrect. Content decisions are yours to make according to your professional judgement.

I completely understand why UMPA representatives and staff would oppose VSU, since the organisation relies on funds compulsorily extracted from students. UMPA’s opposition to VSU makes sense from it’s own perspective, but I do not believe it is in the interests of students for the organisation that represents them to oppose their freedom of choice and association. On that point, Steven Halliwell’s reasoning in “Voluntarily Student Unionism is Anti-choice” is entirely spurious and misleading: there is, logically, nothing anti-choice about making something voluntary.

In response to your rejoinder that:

The fact that we have devoted one edition to women’s issues (as well as providing regular content such as higher education news, book reviews, relevant concerns such as plagiarism) in ten years of this publication hardly seems like a scourge of rampant Leftism.

I agree, but I wouldn’t say that what I characterised as “a kind of new left politics that has wholly assimilated identity politics” was intended to refer to “a scourge of rampant Leftism” in the alarmist Cold War, Keith Windschuttle or Miranda Devine way. Rather, I’d say that the basic tenets of collectivist and identity-political thinking (that too much economic or personal freedom is unethical, that capitalism is a pernicious influence on life, that affirmative action on behalf of disadvantaged social fractions is desirable, etc.) have so permeated intellectual life in this and so many other countries that they could hardly fail to influence the activities of a student association and its staff.

I reiterate my point: letting an organisation take students’ money and spend it on products and services they may or may not want is not a fair or efficient way of treating anyone. The only fair way is to indulge the atomization of society by letting students make their own purchasing decisions. The very existence of PGR is against this principle. Whether you publish practical advice or reviews or propaganda, students have to pay for it whether they wanted it or not.

For the record, I don’t care what social fraction you or anyone prefers to favour, but whether you produce a women’s edition or a men’s edition or a queer edition or a straight edition or anything similar, using funds that come from all students to serve the interests of one group of students is unacceptable. Though I disapprove of such publications in general, since they encourage members of social fractions to pit themselves against each other, there is one way to produce them with minimal controversy. Magazines directed at a social fraction can easily be produced and sold for profit or using voluntarily given funds, and then marketed or distributed to a particular niche audience. Therein lies some of the beauty of free markets. If students, male or female, want a copy of a “women’s edition,” they will soon be able to take their amenities fee and use it to buy a few copies of Cosmo or Cleo. Or they may just choose something that doesn’t indulge their childish instinct to pit “us” against “them.”

On these issues, I think we’ll agree to disagree. I’ll be posting my letters to you on my blog at http://benhourigan.com: if you’d like your full response(s) to appear unedited on the site, please give me your permission by email.

Sincerely,

Ben Hourigan

Why don’t you ever see a homeless person in a movie or on TV holding a sign that says that? Why do their signs always say something like “will strip for food”? I suppose it’s because those fictional characters neither realise that there are many people who want things other than stripping done for them, nor understand the versatile, abstract power of money. I however, understand these things well.

Currently, my credit card balance is way higher than I would like. While I could keep accumulating debt in the hope that my soon being titled “Dr. Ben Hourigan” will bring a whole load of money my way, I am seriously contemplating finding a job right now, hopefully some kind of proofreading or editing work. Also, if I really want to be working in Japan in the next 6 months (which I do), I’d better apply soon.

In the service of this end, I have posted a new version of my resumé, redesigned in response to Annette’s insistence that the old one was ugly. Anyone who’s familiar with Apple’s new Pages application will immediately see that I used it to do the layout. In fact, I didn’t do much except type one of the templates, it was that good. Overall, I’m really impressed with the new app, which has a lot of DTP functions as well as word-processing ones. It’s just a shame there aren’t any templates for book-length documents, like theses…